Relegere: Studies in Religion and Reception
https://relegere.org/relegere
<p><em>Relegere: Studies in Religion and Reception</em> is primarily a book review journal. The journal reviews books on the reception of religion and biblical literature within the fields of Religion and Biblical Studies. All reviews and articles are published open access, under a Creative Commons license (Attribution NonCommercial 3.0). The current issue is available <a href="/relegere/issue/current">here</a>, and the complete archives <a href="/relegere/issue/archive">here</a>. All enquiries should be directed to the journal editor, <a href="mailto:relegere.reviews@otago.ac.nz">Keziah Wallis</a>.</p><p>From 2011 to 2018, the journal also published articles in reception history, also available under <a href="/relegere/issue/archive">Archives</a>. <br /><br />In addition, our online publishers, <a href="https://rap.relegere.org/rap">Relegere Academic Press</a> publishes online books and volumes in reception history.</p><p><strong><br />Journal editor:</strong></p><p><a href="mailto:relegere.reviews@otago.ac.nz">Keziah Wallis</a>, University of Otago</p><p> </p><p><strong>Founding Editors:</strong></p><p><a href="mailto:relegere.journal@otago.ac.nz">Dr Deane Galbraith</a>, University of Otago</p><p><a href="mailto:relegere.journal@otago.ac.nz">Dr James E. Harding</a>, University of Otago</p><p><a href="mailto:relegere.journal@otago.ac.nz">Dr Eric Repphun</a>, Independent</p><p><a href="mailto:relegere.journal@otago.ac.nz">Professor Will Sweetman</a>, University of Otago</p><p><strong><br /></strong></p><strong>Relegere Academic Press editors:</strong><p><a href="mailto:relegere.journal@otago.ac.nz">Dr Sean Durbin</a>, Australian Catholic University</p><p><a href="mailto:relegere.journal@otago.ac.nz">Dr Michelle Fletcher</a>, University of Kent</p><p><a href="mailto:relegere.journal@otago.ac.nz">Dr Deane Galbraith</a>, University of Otago</p><p><a href="mailto:relegere.journal@otago.ac.nz">Dr James E. Harding</a>, University of Otago</p><p><a href="mailto:relegere.journal@otago.ac.nz">Professor Will Sweetman</a>, University of Otago</p><p><strong><br /></strong></p><p> </p><p><strong>Editorial Advisory Board:</strong></p><p>Associate Professor Greg Bailey – La Trobe University</p><p>Dr Erica Baffelli – University of Manchester</p><p>Professor Daniel Boyarin – University of California, Berkeley</p><p>Associate Professor Shayne Clarke – McMaster University</p><p>Professor Gregory W. Dawes – University of Otago</p><p>Professor Ben Dorman – Nanzan University</p><p>Professor David Gunn – Texas Christian University</p><p>Dr Elizabeth Guthrie – University of Otago</p><p>Professor Stewart Hoover – University of Colorado</p><p>Professor Julius Lipner – University of Cambridge</p><p>Dr John Lyons – University of Bristol</p><p>Dr Jonathan Roberts – University of Liverpool</p><p>Professor John F.A. Sawyer - University of Perugia</p><p>Professor Robert Segal – University of Aberdeen</p><p>Professor Jakob Skovgaard-Petersen – University of Copenhagen</p><p><span>Assistant Professor</span> Stefania Travagnin – University of Groningen</p><p>Professor Arthur Versluis – Michigan State University</p>Relegere Academic Pressen-USRelegere: Studies in Religion and Reception1179-7231Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:<br /><br /><ol type="a"><ol type="a"><li>Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal. The work may not be used for commercial purposes. The work may not be altered, transformed, or built upon.</li></ol></ol><br /><ol type="a"><ol type="a"><li>Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.</li></ol></ol><br /><ol type="a"><li>Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See <a style="text-decoration: underline; color: #337755;" href="http://opcit.eprints.org/oacitation-biblio.html" target="_new">The Effect of Open Access</a>).</li></ol>The Book of Exodus: Composition, Reception, and Interpretation, edited by Thomas B. Dozeman, Craig A. Evans, and Joel N. Lohr
https://relegere.org/relegere/article/view/771
Zeb Farber
Copyright (c) 2020 Relegere: Studies in Religion and Reception
2018-12-192018-12-1971-21677210.11157/rsrr7-1-2-771The Bible Retold by Jewish Artists, Writers, Composers and Filmmakers, edited by Helen Leneman and Barry Dov Walfish
https://relegere.org/relegere/article/view/788
Sara M. Koenig
Copyright (c) 2020 Relegere: Studies in Religion and Reception
2018-12-212018-12-2171-21737710.11157/rsrr7-1-2-788Aliens and Strangers? The Struggle for Coherence in the Everyday Lives of Evangelicals, by Anna Strhan
https://relegere.org/relegere/article/view/773
Ibrahim Abraham
Copyright (c) 2020 Relegere: Studies in Religion and Reception
2018-12-192018-12-1971-21778010.11157/rsrr7-1-2-773If God Meant to Interfere: American Literature and the Rise of the Christian Right, by Christopher Douglas
https://relegere.org/relegere/article/view/774
Zhange Ni
Copyright (c) 2020 Relegere: Studies in Religion and Reception
2018-12-192018-12-1971-21818410.11157/rsrr7-1-2-774Stasis: Civil War as a Political Paradigm, by Giorgio Agamben
https://relegere.org/relegere/article/view/775
Beornn McCarthy
Copyright (c) 2020 Relegere: Studies in Religion and Reception
2018-12-192018-12-1971-21858910.11157/rsrr7-1-2-775A Materialism for the Masses: Saint Paul and the Philosophy of Undying Life, by Ward Blanton
https://relegere.org/relegere/article/view/776
Nikolai Blaskow
Copyright (c) 2020 Relegere: Studies in Religion and Reception
2018-12-192018-12-1971-219020210.11157/rsrr7-1-2-776Shakespeare and Early Modern Religion, edited by David Loewenstein and Michael Witmore
https://relegere.org/relegere/article/view/777
Iona Hine
Copyright (c) 2020 Relegere: Studies in Religion and Reception
2018-12-192018-12-1971-2202910.11157/rsrr7-1-2-777Words of Power: Reading Shakespeare and the Bible, by Jem Bloomfield
https://relegere.org/relegere/article/view/778
Michael Cop
Copyright (c) 2020 Relegere: Studies in Religion and Reception
2018-12-192018-12-1971-22091210.11157/rsrr7-1-2-778Children's Bibles in America: A Reception History of the Story of Noah's Ark in US Children's Bibles, by Russell W. Dalton
https://relegere.org/relegere/article/view/780
Kevin McGeough
Copyright (c) 2020 Relegere: Studies in Religion and Reception
2018-12-192018-12-1971-22121510.11157/rsrr7-1-2-780The High Middle Ages, edited by Kari E. Børresen and Adriana Valerio
https://relegere.org/relegere/article/view/781
Christine Axen
Copyright (c) 2020 Relegere: Studies in Religion and Reception
2018-12-192018-12-1971-22162010.11157/rsrr7-1-2-781Reading the Bible in the Middle Ages, edited by Jinty Nelson and Damien Kempf
https://relegere.org/relegere/article/view/782
Lena-Sofia Tiemeyer
Copyright (c) 2020 Relegere: Studies in Religion and Reception
2018-12-192018-12-1971-22202610.11157/rsrr7-1-2-782Patmos in the Reception History of the Apocalypse, by Ian Boxall
https://relegere.org/relegere/article/view/783
Michelle Fletcher
Copyright (c) 2020 Relegere: Studies in Religion and Reception
2018-12-192018-12-1971-22262910.11157/rsrr7-1-2-783The Bible and Art: Perspectives from Oceania, edited by Caroline Blyth and Nasili Vaka’uta
https://relegere.org/relegere/article/view/784
Jonathan Homrighausen
Copyright (c) 2020 Relegere: Studies in Religion and Reception
2018-12-192018-12-1971-22303310.11157/rsrr7-1-2-784John Calvin's Institutes of the Christian Religion, by Bruce Gordon
https://relegere.org/relegere/article/view/785
Jon Balserak
Copyright (c) 2020 Relegere: Studies in Religion and Reception
2018-12-192018-12-1971-22333510.11157/rsrr7-1-2-785Gender Hierarchy in the Qur'ān: Medieval Interpretations, Modern Responses, by Karen Bauer
https://relegere.org/relegere/article/view/786
William Shepard
Copyright (c) 2020 Relegere: Studies in Religion and Reception
2018-12-192018-12-1971-22353910.11157/rsrr7-1-2-786Matthew Chrulew, Transforming Biblical Animals
https://relegere.org/relegere/article/view/768
Matthew Chrulew
Copyright (c) 2020 Relegere: Studies in Religion and Reception
2018-12-172018-12-1771-21–71–710.11157/rsrr7-1-2-768On Behalf of Holy Creatures: Hélène Cixous Reads Leviticus, or, la lecture immonde
https://relegere.org/relegere/article/view/766
<div class="page" title="Page 1"><div class="layoutArea"><div class="column"><p><span>This article performs a critical creative reading of several texts: Lev 11, Lispector’s </span><em>The Passion according to G. H.</em><span>, and Cixous’s essay “The School of Roots”. Each of these texts seeks to understand the human relation to the animal. Cixous’s project in “The School of Roots” is, as Derrida does in </span><em>L’animal</em><span>, to interrogate and reinscribe the biblical text, so that another relation between the human and the animal might become possible. From the platform that Lispector and Cixous create, this reader seeks to open the biblical text to a counter-reading on behalf of the holy creature.</span></p></div></div></div>Yael Klangwisan
Copyright (c) 2020 Relegere: Studies in Religion and Reception
2017-10-172017-10-1771-29–229–2210.11157/rsrr7-1-2-766Can the Prophecies be Trusted?
https://relegere.org/relegere/article/view/769
<div class="page" title="Page 1"><div class="layoutArea"><div class="column"><p><span>Translated with permission from chapter 4 of Vinciane Despret, </span><span><em>Quand le loup habitera avec l’agneau</em> </span><span>(Paris: Les Empêcheurs de penser en rond/Le Seuil, 2002).</span></p></div></div></div>Vinciane Despret
Copyright (c) 2020 Relegere: Studies in Religion and Reception
2018-12-172018-12-1771-223–3823–3810.11157/rsrr7-1-2-769On Making Fleshly Difference: Humanity and Animality in Gregory of Nyssa
https://relegere.org/relegere/article/view/733
<p>This essay explores the theological stakes of differentiating humanity from animality in Gregory of Nyssa’s treatise <em>De hominis opificio</em>. Gregory’s conviction that the <em>imago dei</em> names an essential affinity to the angelic in human beings corresponds to his need to categorically differentiate humanity from animality. Yet, human affinity to God and the angels persistently threatens to collapse into beastly behavior and dispositions. Despite all Gregory’s efforts to shore up human uniqueness, human animality plays an indispensable (though disavowed) role in his theological anthropology. </p>Eric Daryl Meyer
Copyright (c) 2020 Relegere: Studies in Religion and Reception
2018-12-172018-12-1771-239–5839–5810.11157/rsrr7-1-2-733C. S. Lewis, 2 Kings 19:35, and Mice
https://relegere.org/relegere/article/view/765
<div class="page" title="Page 1"><div class="layoutArea"><div class="column"><p><span>C. S. Lewis’s works are replete with animals of various kinds, offering both vivid and memorable characters and also objects of moral concern and theological value. He thereby anticipates what may be seen as a gradual turn toward the inclusion of animals in theological and ethical contemplation since his death in 1963. Although biographers have noted the important creative and religious influences of George MacDonald on Lewis’s work, this article highlights Lewis’s concern for animals as one of MacDonald’s more significant yet overlooked influences. Mice are arguably Lewis’ especial favourite, their small size and fragility offering pastoral, theological, and ethical lessons. In Lewis’s retelling of the Sennacherib story of 2 Kings 19:35, mice are shown to accomplish the work of angels.</span></p></div></div></div>Michael J. Gilmour
Copyright (c) 2020 Relegere: Studies in Religion and Reception
2018-12-172018-12-1771-259–7159–7110.11157/rsrr7-1-2-765What's an Ark?
https://relegere.org/relegere/article/view/731
<div class="page" title="Page 1"><div class="layoutArea"><div class="column"><p><span>An organism threatened with extinction is entrusted to safe storage in the hope that the conditions it needs to survive might one day be available to it again. The ark of Genesis has been widely used to imagine conservation projects of this kind. My paper circumscribes ark building as a conservation activity with other instances of ark building in contemporary culture, from Lars von Trier’s </span><span><em>Melancholia</em> </span><span>to Lee Scratch Perry’s </span><em>Black Ark</em><span>. What is at stake when we decide that some form of life is, or is not, worthy of being set on its way to a life to come?</span></p></div></div></div>Mark Payne
Copyright (c) 2020 Relegere: Studies in Religion and Reception
2017-10-182017-10-1871-273–9173–9110.11157/rsrr7-1-2-731Peaceable Kingdoms in the Digital World
https://relegere.org/relegere/article/view/732
<p>This essay argues that the biblical image of the peaceable kingdom offers a useful filter through which to examine and contemplate the passion and fervor for interspecies friendship in the digital era. I argue that the digital medium of the animal video (more specifically, animal videos that document and record interspecies friendships) can be read as an alternate spacetime: one alleged to be outside of predation. But I also argue that, when we look closer at both the biblical context of this passage as well as visions of interspecies kinship that derive from, or resonate with, the biblical text, the dystopian underside of this almost utopian image can be rendered with more clarity. Perhaps, however, this biblical image—with its messianic undertones—can also help us to set in sharper relief the non-predational, creaturely, potentialities that might still emerge from these digital peaceable kingdoms. </p>Beatrice Marovich
Copyright (c) 2020 Relegere: Studies in Religion and Reception
2017-10-162017-10-1671-293–11393–11310.11157/rsrr7-1-2-732Cerberus Bites Back: A Tale with Three Heads — the Syrophoenician and her Imitators
https://relegere.org/relegere/article/view/763
<div class="page" title="Page 1"><div class="layoutArea"><div class="column"><p><span>Exchanges about dogs operate rhetorically in the stories of the Syrophoenician women in Mark’s gospel, the Canaanite woman in Matthew, and the righteous Justa in the Pseudo-Clementine Homilies. The three stories are thus analysed with a focus on proverbial form, poetic features, and metre. The variations in the way the dogs are employed in the three stories reflect different periods and contexts within early Christianities, and are variously employed to convey abuse, voice, food practices, ethnicity, and gender.</span></p></div></div></div>Alan Cadwallader
Copyright (c) 2020 Relegere: Studies in Religion and Reception
2018-12-172018-12-1771-2115–46115–4610.11157/rsrr7-1-2-763The Politics of the Beast: Rewiring Revelation 17
https://relegere.org/relegere/article/view/764
<div class="page" title="Page 1"><div class="layoutArea"><div class="column"><p><span>Revelation’s Whore of Babylon and the hybrid animal upon which she rides provide a female-beastly assemblage against which is constructed the good sovereignty of the Lamb. Derrida’s thinking of animality and sovereignty indicates how the human political realm carves out its sovereign position in relation to the category “animal” and in reliance on a “reason of the strongest.” It is demonstrated that Revelation’s construction of a good and innocent sovereign Lamb—via contrast with the Whore-and-Beast—collapses due to the complexities of the two rival animalities. The importance of such a reading lies in the necessity to destabilise facile connotations and connections between animals and an “other” beastliness that must be violently conquered.</span></p></div></div></div>Hannah M. Strømmen
Copyright (c) 2020 Relegere: Studies in Religion and Reception
2018-12-172018-12-1771-2147–64147–6410.11157/rsrr7-1-2-764